So, I was at a kegger the other night, and me and this dude got to talking about music, a frequent happening with me, anywhere. Anyway, I knew he was a metalhead, so I said how if I had to pick out any modern form of music that was closest to classical, I'd pick metal, just because of the unique arrangements and such. He agreed in the case of symphonic black metal, but concluded his statement with the sentence: "And everyone hates metalcore". At which point I objected, and hence started the discussion that inspired this writing.
I'm really sick of hypocrisy in music, especially extreme, "rebellious" forms of music. The whole "we're non-conformists because we conform to this extreme music's ideology" bullshit really gets under my skin. I think that the idea of metal, when it started, was "Fuck you, mainstream. We're not going to write music that prescribes to a set formula of songwriting. We're gonna do our own thing." And they did.
And it was awesome.
But now it seems metal is in a place where "metalheads" aren't willing to admit it's metal if the artists do what they want with the music instead of trying to keep themselves confined in a certain set of rules and song formulas. Which is exactly what metal was trying to get out of when it first appeared on the scene.
...
Enter metalcore; the argument aforementioned dude used (if I can remember correctly) was that metalcore wasn't real metal because it didn't stay true to the ideology of satanic black metal. I don't think metal should be defined by any particular ideology; it's an extreme form of music.
Which brings me to another point: what's with ultra-sub-classification of music? I mean, trying to make music fit into a box is one thing; making an excel spreadsheet with attached diagrams and a legend for quick reference is quite another. Any musician that seriously starts describing their genre using more than three words should be greeted by a swift kick to the face, followed by raucous laughter. I do understand the desire to classify music for convenience; but like I said, you should only need three or less words to describe it. If you want to get specific about a band using words...don't. Just tell your audience to go listen to said bands music. Not complicated at all and it accomplishes what you were trying to do as a fan, which is getting people to listen to your favorite band's music. CRAZINESS.
I once had someone describe some trance music as "psy-trance-electro-happyhardcore-fusion", so after kicking them in the face I realized I didn't have to listen to the artist anyway because I'd already read the book.
Plus most black metal sucks ass anyway. Just kidding!
\m/,
Brian
Monday, August 25, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

2 comments:
Hey Brian,
I'm not exactly sure what you're saying here...
I've been thinking about this idea of metal being satanic, and disagreeing with it. Coupled with the idea of satanists actually being true satanists. Because satan is disorder and chaos, so a satanist should rejoice if his guitar doesn't work and he is kicked in the face, which I doubt any "satanist" would.
I'm thinking this because I know some good metal musicians in the Peterborough Diocese who are, I think, confused about their religion, possibly thinking that satanism and metal go together, instead of good music and our Good God.
So, if there is some way you guys could share music and faith, a really good thing might happen...
I'm thinking of John Ellis (skinny guy in the white shirt if you can see the video) http://www.facebook.com/video/video.php?v=42160198688&oid=30189446998
Their band is called the Sons of Thor: http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=30189446998
and Nathan Waddington, who is with a band called Backhanded Compliment:http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=14605517733&refurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2Fs.php%3Fq%3Dskarekr0e%26init%3Dq
and does his own solo stuff called Skarekr0e: http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=31935367400&refurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2Fs.php%3Fq%3Dskarekr0e%26init%3Dq
Anyways, you could delete this post if it isn't quite the comment you expect on here, but give it some thought and prayer please.
Pax et Caritas Christi sit semper tecum, Nic
RE: "Because satan is disorder and chaos, so a satanist should rejoice if his guitar doesn't work and he is kicked in the face, which I doubt any "satanist" would."
Someone doesn't know anything about Satanism....
Seriously though, I agree Brian. Anyone that thinks to be "metal" you have to be a Black Metal band is freaking bonkers.
I'm guilty of getting pretty nitty gritty about my music clasifications but I wouldn't be opposed to using "metal" as the catch all parent category the spans everything.
From power metal ballads by the likes of Iced Earth, to Nu-metal jams like Disturbed all the way to Goregrind like Exhumed and Technical Death Metal like Necrophagist. Oh, and let's not forget the classics like Sabbath and Priest.
I think it all boils down to the fact that people think that by dismissing a particular genre as non-metal or mainstream they think they are increasing their cred or something.
Rant Mode set to 'off'.
- Dan
Post a Comment