There seems to be no predominant trends in naming songs in the music industry either. Actually, that's not entirely true - most radio friendly songs have titles that are under 5 words. You'll have to forgive me my generalization, I don't normally listen to radio friendly music.
RADIO FRIENDLY TITLES
So on one hand, we have that school of thought - short and sweet. Usually a line from the song that conveys in a general sense what the song is about, prepping the listener for the experience. A valid method of song naming.
THE 'NOVELIZATION' APPROACH
On the other hand, we have hardcore/metalcore/whatever you like bands with song titles like: No need for introductions, I've read about you on the back of toilet doors (Bring Me The Horizon). Ten+ word song titles, also expressing the meaning of what the song is about. It adds an artsy air to the naming process which can sometimes come across as pretentious - fortunately, BMTH have avoided such a misunderstanding by being awesome and ruling schools. Also a valid method of song naming, but one that should be used with caution.
THE 'LETS NAME THE SONG OH LOOK A DEER' METHOD
And then there are bands who choose song names that have little or nothing to do with the song itself. It's a trend I've noticed most prevalently in Indie Music, but not being a connoisseur of such music I can't really give an example. This is a trend I have a hard time giving credence to - to me it represents an offhanded view of the listener, for whose benefit the song is named. That might just be my feelings about it though; you could argue that it's meant instead to show a playful attitude towards the music industry/songwriting/etc or to juxtapose deep meaningful lyrics with sillyness or many other possible explanations. Thus, I'll overcome my feelings about it, and also rate it a valid method of song naming, although one that should be used with even greater caution than the novelization approach.
So that brings me to my conundrum. d'Archangel has always had a hard time naming tunes - now that it isn't just me writing the lyrics, I feel like I have less say in what the song title should be. We have this sweet new tune that we've been writing the past couple of weeks, and have dubbed it "the ballad" as a working title. Other working titles have been extravagant, silly, and not fit for polite conversation (normally detailing what people can do with objects or the type of activities people enjoy). Another new tune we're working on has earned the moniker of "the drug song". And here is the joy of it.
Once something has a name in my head, it gets REALLY hard for me to think of another one. Working titles are necessary for group songwriting. I accept this. It's just hard for to think of our new tune as anything other than "the ballad" now.
Sometimes, the working title ends up becoming the actual song title. "Situations" is an example of that, and you'll be able to listen to it on our upcoming CD, The Atrophy of Entropy.
Goodnight, and may the mosh find you all well.
\m/,
Brian
